Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdoh, Adovi Fulbert Richcarlos-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T14:25:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-10T14:25:24Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1023-
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, the Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal, and the RWTH University of Aachen in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the International Master Program in Renewable Energy and Green Hydrogen (Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and Green Hydrogen Technology)en_US
dc.description.abstractWith the need for a shift from the use of fossil fuels to renewable energy, wind technology is one of the promising, clean, renewable, and cost-effective energy sources. For sub-Saharan regions where 600 million people still lack electricity, wind energy appears to be an opportunity to assure energy security especially, in southern Africa, where abundant wind energy potential exists. Basically, wind technology consists of the use of a wind turbine, which extracts the kinetic energy of moving air through a rotor. This implies the knowledge of wind speed at the rotor level, known as Hub height (around 100m), but wind measurements are typically done at ground level (around 10m). Therefore, it is crucial to find alternative ways for wind data assessment at the rotor level. Numerical atmospheric datasets and height scaling methods seem to be solutions. This study evaluates the impact of using different height scaling methods with and without numerical atmospheric datasets, the high-resolution ICON in Limited Area Mode (ICON-LAM), the ERA5 reanalysis, and the statistical downscaling variant of ERA5 (ERA5_GWA) on the multiple heights wind speed calculation and subsequently, on the wind power estimation over southern Africa from 2017 to 2019. The results show that ERA5_GWA outperforms ERA5 and ICON-LAM for the 10m wind speed simulation. ERA5 introduced the highest bias with an underestimation of the wind power at 20m, 40m and 60m, regardless of the used wind speed height scaling method. Most of the scaling methods performed similarly except for the Justus_Law, which introduced an overestimation of the wind power, and the Linear interpolation, which introduced an underestimation. The accuracy of scaling methods using vertical levels of wind speed from numerical atmospheric datasets is highly dependent on the choices of the nearest levels close to the target height wind speed. This study reveals that the choice of datasets has a greater impact than wind speed height scaling on wind energy assessment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWASCALen_US
dc.subjectICON-LAMen_US
dc.subjectERA5en_US
dc.subjectGlobal Wind Atlasen_US
dc.subjectWind Speeden_US
dc.subjectHeight Scalingen_US
dc.subjectWind Poweren_US
dc.subjectAfrica.en_US
dc.titleImplication of Wind Speed Data variant for Wind Power Simulationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Georesources (Water and Wind) and Technology - Batch 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adovi_Fulbert_Richcarlos.pdfMaster Thesis3.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in WASCAL Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.