Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/702
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkinsanola, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorOgunjobi, K. O.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T15:33:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-26T15:33:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.otherDOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6691-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/702-
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of seven CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs), driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset to simulate the observed rainfall characteristics over West Africa during the period of 1990–2008. The seasonal climatology, annual rainfall cycles, interannual variability, 850 hPa specific humidity, and wind fields of the RCMs outputs were assessed over a number of spatial scales covering three climatically homogenous subregions (Guinea Coast, Savannah, and Sahel) and the entire West Africa domain. The ability of the RCMs to simulate the response to El Nino and La Nina events were further assessed. Results indicate that the RCMs captured the spatial pattern of rainfall and the three distinctive phases of the West African monsoon reasonably. It is worth noting that RCA and CRCM5 failed to distinctively reproduce the monsoon jump while CCLM, HIRHAM, and REMO largely overestimated the amount of the pre- and the post-monsoon rainfall. The analysis also showed significant biases in individual models depending on the subregion and season under consideration. These biases appear to be linked to the model’s failure to resolve convective processes and topography accurately. The majority of the RCMs used were consistent with the ground observation in capturing the dry (wet) conditions associated with the El Nino (La Nina) events. Statistical analysis conclusively revealed that the RCMs performance varies over the subregions and seasons, implying that no single model is best at all time. In general, REGCM3 was found to be the most outstanding of all the RCMs and is therefore recommended for use in rainfall assessment over West Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Earth Scienceen_US
dc.subjectCORDEX-Africaen_US
dc.subjectWest African monsoonen_US
dc.subjectClimatologyen_US
dc.subjectPrecipitation characteristicsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of present-day rainfall simulations over West Africa in CORDEX regional climate modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:West African Climate Systems

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of present-day rainfall simulations over West Africa.pdf9.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in WASCAL Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.