Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1017
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBinda, Paul Nowah-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T12:51:15Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-10T12:51:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1017-
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, the Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal, and the RWTH University of Aachen in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the International Master Program in Renewable Energy and Green Hydrogen (Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and Green Hydrogen Technology)en_US
dc.description.abstractGreenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions contribute to climate change due to conventional energy production and use across the globe. In this sense, economies worldwide are now transitioning to cleaner energy systems with the purpose of providing net-zero carbon. Therefore, hydrogen is increasingly becoming a key part of this development due to its flexible production pathways, versatile uses, and ability to facilitate decarbonized electrification, energy security, and industrial applications. While more global attention focuses on green hydrogen from renewable electrolysis, its use in Africa remains limited by high capital costs, infrastructures gaps, and accessible funds. On the other hand, naturally occurring white hydrogen discovered in Bourakébougou, Mali offers a potential low-cost alternative, but it cost competitiveness compared to green hydrogen in Africa is not known. This research addresses this knowledge gap by conducting a comparative economic assessment of green and white hydrogen production in Bourakébougou, Mali. Utilizing economic modelling approach, Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) and Net Present Value (NPV), the research takes into account capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX) and a discounted cash flow analysis for a 25-year project duration. The result indicates that green hydrogen, produced by off-grid solar-powered electrolysis, is of high CAPEX and a low OPEX with a LCOH of 4.78 USD/kg and a relatively low NPV of 9.54 million USD. On the other hand, white hydrogen, naturally extracted from subsurface geological layers, has a LCOH of 1.79 USD/kg and a high NPV of 44.39 million USD and represents more economically feasible option under prevailing conditions. Sensitivity analysis determines that the most significant driver of green hydrogen economics is CAPEX and OPEX has a stronger impact on white hydrogen economics. Green hydrogen is determined to have significant long-term environmental and socio-economic benefits, whereas white hydrogen has a short-term economic prospect for Bourakébougou, particularly in a region with favorable geological resources.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWASCALen_US
dc.subjectHydrogenen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectGreen hydrogenen_US
dc.subjectWhite hydrogenen_US
dc.subjectLevelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH)en_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of the cost of Green hydrogen and White hydrogen in Africa: “Case of Bourakébougou, Mali”en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and GH Technology - Batch 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PAUL NOWAH BINDA_Thesis.pdfMaster Thesis1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in WASCAL Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.