Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKane, Aida-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T10:44:07Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-09T10:44:07Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-16-
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1005-
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, the Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal, and the RWTH University of Aachen in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the International Master Program in Renewable Energy and Green Hydrogen (Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and Green Hydrogen Technology)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the transition towards a sustainable energy system with low-carbon emissions, green hydrogen production is emerging as a key pathway to reduce dependency on fossil fuels. In West Africa, the abundance of renewable energy sources offers significant opportunities for this transition. However, water scarcity remains a critical challenge. This study compares the efficiency of two water supply processes for green hydrogen production: desalination via reverse osmosis (RO) and direct air capture (DAC) via the solid direct air capture (S-DAC) method, both powered by a hybrid system of solar PV and wind energy coupled with proton-exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM). Using a techno-economic assessment combined with cost efficiency accounting method, with the cost efficiency (CE) as an indicator. The CE is the ratio of ideal and actual costs of production. The analyses evaluate the performance of the two processes under ideal conditions (No losses ) and actual conditions (with losses) by using the CE with M’bour, Senegal, as a case study. The levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) represents the ideal and actual costs of production, respectively, in the ideal and actual cases. The results show that desalination-based green hydrogen production from seawater desalination is more cost-effective than DAC-based hydrogen production. Under actual conditions, the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from desalination was 5.304 €/kg compared to 6.209 €/kg for DAC, while both processes yielded nearly identical costs of 3.83 €/kg under ideal conditions. The cost efficiency (CE) analysis of the two methods demonstrates that desalination achieves 72% compared to DAC, with 62%, reflecting lower value losses for desalination-based hydrogen production and a better alignment between theoretical and practical performance. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the hybrid renewable configuration is the best option in a region where solar and wind are abundant, while production based on wind energy increases the value losses, particularly for DAC. The findings of this analysis suggest that in coastal areas, specially M’bour, where seawater is available, desalination should be prioritized for the production of green hydrogen. Nevertheless, S-DAC is a strategic potential for inland and arid regions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWASCALen_US
dc.subjectDirect air captureen_US
dc.subjectSolid direct air captureen_US
dc.subjectDesalinationen_US
dc.subjectReverse osmosisen_US
dc.subjectGreen hydrogenen_US
dc.subjectCost efficiencyen_US
dc.titleComparative efficiency analysis of green hydrogen production with the process of direct air capture (DAC) and desalination in West Africa: A case study of M’bour, Senegalen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and GH Technology - Batch 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AIDA KANE - Thesis.pdfMaster Thesis1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in WASCAL Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.