Abstract:
Since CO2 is the primary greenhouse gas causing global warming, CO2-free solutions like e-methanol enable the energy transition. E-methanol is renewable and carbon-negative by extracting CO2 from the air via Direct Air Capture sorbent. While e-methanol is environmentally beneficial, is it economically feasible? This research examined the cost structure and value chain for two e-methanol production scenarios. Scenario 1 uses solid sorbent DAC for CO2 and H2O to generate syngas via co-electrolysis with solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC), then methanol by CO hydrogenation. Scenario 2 is direct CO2 hydrogenation using DAC CO2 and PEM hydrogen. Analysing inputs/outputs showed Scenario 1 consumes fewer raw materials and energy with better efficiency. SOEC Syngas Scenario 1 has a 0.63€/kg levelized cost, 50% lower than the 1.26 €/kg for PEM hydrogen Scenario 2. Detailed cost structure analysis revealed syngas/hydrogen, electricity, SOEC capital, and DAC capital/sorbent costs as key drivers. Sensitivity analysis showed 16% lower Scenario 1 methanol cost with projected 2050 SOEC capital reductions, 10% lower with DAC capital reductions, and 33% lower with electricity reductions.
Description:
A Thesis submitted to the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, the Université Cheikh Anta Diop,Senegal, and the RWTH University of Aachen in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the International Master Program in Renewable Energy and Green Hydrogen (Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and Green Hydrogen Technology)