Abstract:
This study focuses on the ability of the global Land Data Assimilation System,
LDAS-Monde, to improve the representation of land surface variables (LSVs) over Burkina-Faso
through the joint assimilation of satellite derived surface soil moisture (SSM) and leaf area index (LAI)
from January 2001 to June 2018. The LDAS-Monde offline system is forced by the latest European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis ERA5 as well as
ERA-Interim former reanalysis, leading to reanalyses of LSVs at 0.25 0.25 and 0.50 0.50
spatial resolution, respectively. Within LDAS-Monde, SSM and LAI observations from the Copernicus
Global Land Service (CGLS) are assimilated with a simplified extended Kalman filter (SEKF) using
the CO2-responsive version of the ISBA (Interactions between Soil, Biosphere, and Atmosphere)
land surface model (LSM). First, it is shown that ERA5 better represents precipitation and incoming
solar radiation than ERA-Interim former reanalysis from ECMWF based on in situ data. Results of
four experiments are then compared: Open-loop simulation (i.e., no assimilation) and analysis
(i.e., joint assimilation of SSM and LAI) forced by either ERA5 or ERA-Interim. After jointly
assimilating SSM and LAI, it is noticed that the assimilation is able to impact soil moisture in
the first top soil layers (the first 20 cm), and also in deeper soil layers (from 20 cm to 60 cm and
below), as reflected by the structure of the SEKF Jacobians. The added value of using ERA5 reanalysis
over ERA-Interim when used in LDAS-Monde is highlighted. The assimilation is able to improve
the simulation of both SSM and LAI: The analyses add skill to both configurations, indicating
the healthy behavior of LDAS-Monde. For LAI in particular, the southern region of the domain
(dominated by a Sudan-Guinean climate) highlights a strong impact of the assimilation compared to
the other two sub-regions of Burkina-Faso (dominated by Sahelian and Sudan-Sahelian climates).
In the southern part of the domain, differences between the model and the observations are the largest, prior to any assimilation. These differences are linked to the model failing to represent
the behavior of some specific vegetation species, which are known to put on leaves before the first
rains of the season. The LDAS-Monde analysis is very efficient at compensating for this model
weakness. Evapotranspiration estimates from the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model
(GLEAM) project as well as upscaled carbon uptake from the FLUXCOM project and sun-induced
fluorescence from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) are used in the evaluation
process, again demonstrating improvements in the representation of evapotranspiration and gross
primary production after assimilation.